Making Intelligence as Sharable as Knowledge
A research initiative exploring how individuals can take control of their information diet and collectively develop optimal knowledge workflows through open collaboration.
We define intelligence not as what you know, but as how you come to know it: your process for gathering, filtering, and synthesizing information to achieve understanding. An optimal knowledge workflow for a specific task is what makes someone intelligent in that domain.
Information overload is one of the defining challenges of our time. While we have unprecedented access to knowledge, most of us consume information through recommendation algorithms designed to maximize engagement, not understanding.
Worse, the intelligence processes we develop—our personal strategies for finding and filtering information—remain locked in our heads, unable to be automated, shared, or improved upon collectively.
What if we could define our own knowledge workflows, automate them, and collaborate with others the same way we do with code or research projects?
Shared Intelligence is a research initiative exploring this question through three core capabilities:
Express complex knowledge workflows explicitly—how you gather, filter, and synthesize information.
Execute these workflows automatically, saving hours of manual work.
Share your workflows with others and collectively improve them—just like open-source code.
By making intelligence (the process) as sharable as knowledge (the product), we enable collective improvement of how humans interact with information. Instead of everyone independently fighting information overload, communities can share, adapt, and refine the workflows that work.
Understanding current limitations reveals opportunities for innovation. Our research addresses three interconnected challenges.
Sophisticated recommendation algorithms currently live within large platforms—institutions with the infrastructure to build and maintain complex curation systems at scale. While technically impressive, these systems serve millions with generalized approaches.
The Gap: Individual users lack personal recommendation engines they can control, customize, and refine for their specific goals.
Research Question: How can we return agency to individuals in defining their information diet?
Everyone independently develops their own information curation strategies—what sources to follow, how to filter noise, when to deep-dive. These personal intelligence processes are:
The Gap: We lack mechanisms to measure, optimize, and collectively improve these intelligence processes.
Research Question: Can we design systems where optimization aligns with user learning and growth?
We have mature infrastructure for knowledge artifacts (storage, search, sharing), but no equivalent for intelligence processes:
The Gap: Without tools to externalize workflows, expertise remains trapped and communities cannot develop best practices.
Research Question: What infrastructure enables knowledge workflows to be shared and collaboratively refined?
Let's build it together...
A three-phase research agenda toward collective intelligence
Open-source query language for expressing and executing knowledge workflows
Visual workflow builder making SIQL accessible to non-programmers
GitHub-like platform for sharing and forking knowledge workflows
Let's see how it works...
Think of it as "SQL for knowledge"—instead of querying databases, you query any information source with AI-powered filtering and synthesis. Create workflows that run on schedules, monitor for changes, or execute on-demand with custom inputs.
Build multi-step workflows that run automatically—gathering, filtering, and synthesizing information from multiple sources on your schedule.
// Define extraction and formatting criteria
$key_debates = "Ongoing discussions, controversial viewpoints, emerging consensus"
$format_description = "Markdown with sections: Executive Summary, Key Papers, Community Insights, Industry News"
WORKFLOW "AI Safety Research Monitor" {
SOURCES {
academic: [arxiv, semantic_scholar],
forums: [lesswrong, alignment_forum],
industry: [openai.blog, anthropic.blog]
}
PIPELINE {
PARALLEL {
$papers = SEARCH ["AI safety", "alignment"] FROM academic
| FILTER date > 7_days_ago,
$discussions = FETCH FROM forums
| FILTER date > 7_days_ago
| EXTRACT $key_debates,
$announcements = FETCH FROM industry
| FILTER date > 7_days_ago
}
SYNTHESIZE "Weekly digest: Research breakthroughs,
community debates, industry developments" WITH [$papers, $discussions, $announcements]
| FORMAT $format_description
}
OUTPUTS {
schedule: WEEKLY(day: "Sunday", time: "8:00am"),
format: email
}
}
Result: Complex research monitoring that would take hours of manual work runs automatically every week, synthesizing insights from academic papers, community discussions, and industry announcements.
From simple queries to complex multi-source workflows—SIQL grows with your needs. Start simple, scale to sophistication.
Join Croissant in building shared intelligence!
Help us create a world where individuals have absolute control over their information diet and can collaborate to grow collective intelligence.
We envision a future where everyone understands how they gather, filter, and synthesize information—and can share these knowledge workflows with others. Instead of isolated, manual research processes, we're building infrastructure for collective intelligence.
The time is critical. We need to move fast and achieve wide adoption for this vision to become reality. Every contributor brings us closer to a world where intelligence is as shareable as knowledge.
Phase 1 of SIQL is about making the language widely usable across different sources and use cases. To do that, we need source adapters—modular connectors that let SIQL gather information from any source.
By building an adapter, you enable yourself and everyone else to use SIQL with new sources—expanding the language's power and reach.
Each adapter unlocks new use cases: academic research, market intelligence, content curation, competitive monitoring, and more.
Want to contribute to the future of collective intelligence?
Reach Out